ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with myocarditis in the general population. However, application of gold standard techniques is often missing, and data about patients with history of myocarditis have not been reported yet. METHODS: We evaluated 21 patients (median age 27, 86% males) for suspected myocarditis after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We divided cases with previous diagnosis of myocarditis (PM, N.=7), from naïve controls (NM, N.=14). All patients were investigated thoroughly by cardiac magnetic resonance (100%) with or without endomyocardial biopsy (14%). RESULTS: Overall, 57% of patients met updated Lake Louise criteria and none fulfilled Dallas criteria, with no remarkable differences between groups. Acute coronary syndrome-like presentation was more frequent in NM with earlier normalization of troponin than PM. NM and PM already healed from myocarditis were clinically comparable, whereas PM with active inflammation had subtle presentation and were evaluated for immunosuppressive therapy modulation. None had fulminant myocarditis and/or malignant ventricular arrhythmia at presentation. No major cardiac events occurred by 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the suspicion of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis was inconstantly confirmed by gold standard diagnostics. Myocarditis was uncomplicated in both PM and NM patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to validate COVID-19 vaccination in this population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Inflammation/complications , Myocarditis/etiology , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/pathology , RNA, Messenger , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myocarditis lacks systematic characterization in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myocarditis in the context of COVID-19 infection. Diagnostic and treatment strategies were driven by a dedicated multidisciplinary disease unit for myocarditis. Multimodal outcomes were assessed during prospective follow-up. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients (57% males, age 51 ± 9 y) with acute COVID-19 infection received a de novo diagnosis of myocarditis. Endomyocardial biopsy was of choice in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 4, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 ± 9%), whereas cardiac magnetic resonance constituted the first exam in stable patients (n = 3, mean LVEF 48 ± 10%). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed an intra-myocardial SARS-CoV-2 genome in one of the six cases undergoing biopsy: in the remaining patients, myocarditis was either due to other viruses (n = 2) or virus-negative (n = 3). Hemodynamic support was needed for four unstable patients (57%), whereas a cardiac device implant was chosen in two of four cases showing ventricular arrhythmias. Medical treatment included immunosuppression (43%) and biological therapy (29%). By the 6-month median follow-up, no patient died or experienced malignant arrhythmias. However, two cases (29%) were screened for heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Myocarditis associated with acute COVID-19 infection is a spectrum of clinical manifestations and underlying etiologies. A multidisciplinary approach is the cornerstone for tailored management.